QUOTE (Alexa @ Apr 16 2006 11 32 AM)

^On the other hand, while Gillian may be getting more recognition as an actress, Charlene's looks have recently been getting a lot more praise too. It sort of bugs me that people act like EVERYONE thinks Gillian is prettier, cause it's all just perception, yeah? Some people percieve Gillian to be prettier, some Sa, it's all just preference. I do agree that MORE people percieve Gillian as being pretty cause she has the features that are considered universally pretty - big round eyes, full lips, tall nose, etc. While Sa's face is more unique in the beauty relm as her eyes aren't terribly big (but they aren't small either), a flat nose and sort of thin lips, yet she still is pretty despite the fact that her features aren't "ideal." So yeah, I think Gillian's looks are generally more accepted as being beautiful while with Sa, not everyone can see her beauty (and blessed be the ones who can

) But I don't think Gill fans feel threatened by Sa becoming prettier do they? I know I don't feel threatened by Gill, I am happy for her getting more recognition.
But....if Sa didn't get this so-called bias treatment towards Sa when they first began (and I don't know much about it since I wasn't a Twins fan until after their Evolution album was released), would Sa still be around? You say it's not fair what EEG does to Gill, but at the same time it wasn't fair that Gillian was more popular than Sa just cause she's "prettier." If this bias treatment kept Twins together, then I am happy.. Regardless of what stupid EEG's plans were, I rather would have Gill face the bias treatment AND overcome it rather than not having Twins around together. Cause I like them best together...
But why does everything always have to be such a competition for Twins? Why can't we just be happy that Gill has so many loyal fans and that Sa has a lot of opportunities for her? Obviously, if Gill has so much more fans, she doesn't needs the extra opportunities, yeah? You guys don't want Sa to disapear do ya? Cause from some of the things I read here (and maybe I percieved them wrong which could be true) makes it seems like if Sa wouldn't have gotten the "extra" opportunities and promotions then she wouldn't be in the entertainment industry today and Gill would be thriving. Seems to me Gillian is already thriving without the extra promotions...I mean people talk about how unfair it is to Gill, but it's just as unfair to Sa that she does not get as much support from fans as Gill does just cause of her looks. So this is why I don't like to focus on EEG's treatment of Twins cause no one focuses on the public treatment of Twins and how unfair that is. I would rather just be happy for both Twins cause they are both astronomically (is that a word?) successful
I know people are gonna misinterpet what I said, so I would like to make a disclaimer now: In no way am I dissing Gillian in the above post, nor am I saying what EEG did was FAIR...
I guess, this is one of the highlighting reasons why Twins fans aren't as united as before. Sa fans actually do support the bias treatment so that their favorite one out of Twins can continue to shine alone under the so called name Twins whereas Gillian fans have actually endured far more than enough to want to stop this bias treatment that has limited Gillian in so many ways.
How can anyone view Gillian's beauty as being an unfair attribute in popularity?

That is Gillian; she was naturally blessed with pretty features. So do we have to strip Gillian of her opportunities just based on the fact that Sa doesn't receive as much attention or support from fans who idolize pretty figures? I know that you wouldn't be as supportive of this bias treatment if Sa had to sacrifice a few of her grand opportunities just for the sake of Gillian. The support from fans is an element that varies, which shouldn't even be included in the picture of competition between Twins. If the bias treatment had indeed been successful, Gillian would have ceased to exist in ET industry but as long as Sa succeeds correct? When you refer to Twins remaining as Twins, Sa is the one who has more advantages so how is that in any way beneficial to Gillian when she has to live under someone else's shadows her entire career? I don't know why Twins are Twins when Sa seems to be receiving all of the spot light abandoning Gillian as the talentless major eyecandy doll.
In a fluctuating career such as singing and acting, opportunities are the most crucial and essential ingredient to success. Appearance will not always shield Gillian from cruel remarks and heavy judgment. Even until today, Gillian is still battling a war of criticisms on her acting and singing, which have tremendously improved but to some, will never achieve satisfaction based on the initial stereotype of being pretty.

If Gillian keeps receiving minor characters and dull roles just to pave way for Sa's acting success then wouldn't Gillian quickly fade? But it's not like EEG thoroughly chose Gillian's recent roles anyways, they just tossed Gillian something to portray in the meantime, but fortunately, became decent hits.
I don't wish for Sa to disappear but I do wish for Twins to be Twins on a balanced platform. Competition is bound to happen sooner or later; actually, it already began ever since Twins was formed. I don't wish to see Sa or Gillian stall one or the other's career just because of popularity issues. Sa and Gillian will never share the same amount of popularity or support from fans and there shouldn't be any cheating hands involved either.

If 5-6 years of top-notch promotions towards Sa and she's still trailing behind in terms of popularity and recognition then perhaps there is much more to Gillian than just the pretty appearance like several Gillian Fans have discovered. If 5-6 years of top-notch promotions invested towards Sa and yet she still trails behind in popularity and support from fans then perhaps, it wasn't necessary to state how unfair it is for Sa that Gillian has more fans/support based on her looks. Of course, beauty is what initially attracted fans but it was Gillian's true charming personality that sustained their interest, support, and loyalty.
QUOTE (Little_Purple_Bell @ Apr 16 2006 12 09 PM)

But when Twins debuted, wasn't that the time of where the biased issue was the worst of all times? Gillian had basically nothing to do outside the label of Twins except that she was invited by Jackie Chan to host the 'Making Of' of his new film while Charlene had films to work on. I suppose I guess more popular wasn't the right phrase to use to describe how Charlene was when Twins first debuted, but I mean that she was the one more noticed for her career, like favoured more about her achievements in the entertainment industry, sort of thing? The media sure loved talking about Gillian, I'm aware of that, but it was mostly about rumours. The big chaotic matter with Edison-Gillian-Shawn? Yes, I bet no one can forget about that. Gillian frequently pops up on magazine covers about these things, but it's mean how she wasn't noticed for her career. I agree of how you explained the past situation with Twins; it's all about stereotyping by HK. An artiste is always automatically demoted to being talentless if you have a pretty face, and the 'less pretty' one always has more talent, according to the fellow HK citizens.
I wish Gillian could have followed the footsteps of Cecilia since she is known to be one of the prettiest HK actresses. When Cecilia emerged, people were so critical of her beauty=no talent but within a few films, she quickly became of the most successful drama Queens. Her roles were quite challenging and daring too, which pushed her to the top amongst all of the other older actresses. If only Gillian began portraying roles like BOK then, she could have quickly eliminated her name as one of the fakest actresses of HK. The bias treatment was predominantly visible in Twins' beginning days and have lessened, now that Gillian has established herself as Gillian Chung in both arenas. I don't know why HK residents believe in that silly cliche.
QUOTE (Little_Purple_Bell @ Apr 16 2006 12 09 PM)

EEG didn't have to conclude that Charlene was the more popular one; they just simply liked her more out of the two members in Twins. There were fans who spoke out for the biased issue when Twins first debuted, so I'm sure there were some fans who weren't supportive of the biased issue. Back when Twins first debuted, there were fans who made a huge protest online to the point where the media reported on it. The fans were protesting of how EEG is biased towards Charlene and leaving Gillian out. I don't know why nothing really happened in the end because obviously the protest didn't help much with biased issue, though with the huge commotion, as the biased treatment still exists to this present day.
Yeah, I remember. There were articles and newspapers printing out the bias treatment, which gained a lot of awareness and publicity but I guess, the case never really went anywhere since Twins fans were so united back then, they didn't really support a disbandment of Twins so they had to accept the bias treatment. The bias treatment has only lessened not because the authorities of EEG all of sudden adored Gillian for her dedication and hard work but rather because they're planning on splitting Twins for further money milking. I guess, EEG never really planned on promoting Gillian solo but hey, why not? She's a pretty successful individual now and even without all of the extra promotions too. They didn't invest much as expected but gained awfully well.